Selection on a single locus drives plumage differentiation in the Rufous-collared Sparrow (<i>Zonotrichia capensis</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Rufous-collared Sparrow (Zonotrichia capensis) shows phenotypic variation throughout its distribution. In particular, the Patagonian subspecies Z. c. australis is strikingly distinct from all other subspecies, lacking the black crown stripes that characterize the species, with a uniformly grey head and overall paler plumage. We sequenced whole genomes of 18 individuals (9 Z. c. australis and 9 from other subspecies from northern Argentina) to explore the genomic basis of these color differences and to investigate how they may have evolved. We detected a single ~465-kb divergence peak on chromosome 5 that contrasted with a background of low genomic differentiation and contains the suppression of tumorigenicity 5 (ST5) gene. ST5 regulates RAB9A, which is required for melanosome biogenesis and melanocyte pigmentation in mammals, making it a strong candidate gene for the melanic plumage polymorphism within Z. capensis. This genomic island of differentiation may have emerged because of selection acting on allopatric populations or against gene flow on populations in physical and genetic contact. Mitochondrial DNA indicated that Z. c. australis diverged from other subspecies ~400,000 years ago, suggesting a putative role of Pleistocene glaciations. Phenotypic differences are consistent with Gloger's rule, which predicts lighter-colored individuals in colder and drier climates like that of Patagonia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".