MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409762115 · doi:10.1136/sextrans-2024-056286

Developing and validating a Bayesian clinical risk prediction model for three sexually transmitted infections in key populations from two Canadian provinces

2025· article· en· W4409762115 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Fiorella Vialard, Qihuang Zhang, Duncan Webster, Stefanie Materniak, Alexandre Dumont Blais, Suma Nair, Susan J. Bartlett, Nitika Pant Pai

Bibliographic record

VenueSexually Transmitted Infections · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive tract infections research
Canadian institutionsBritish American Tobacco (Canada)Saint John Regional HospitalMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineSyphilisMen who have sex with menReceiver operating characteristicIncidence (geometry)DemographyCoinfectionSexually transmitted diseaseHepatitis CHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Risk assessmentInternal medicineVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives Across Canada, in the last decade, incidence rates of sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections (STBBI) have peaked (syphilis) or plateaued (hepatitis C virus (HCV) and HIV). Key populations (gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men, trans and gender-diverse people, and people who use injection drugs) are at greater risk for these STBBIs, so correctly predicting risk before screening potentially infected individuals is crucial. We developed and validated a diagnostic clinical risk prediction model (CRPM) estimating HIV, HCV and syphilis risk for two key populations in two Canadian provinces. Methods We used 20 variables and STBBI test results from a cross-sectional study evaluating multiplexed testing (detection of coinfections) in New Brunswick and Quebec (n=400) to develop our CRPM. We randomly split the data into development (n=300) and validation (n=100) datasets using clinic-stratified sampling. We used Bayesian predictive projection with development data to select ranked STBBI predictors. We obtained the ORs of the highest performing submodel measured as area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity with 89% credible intervals (89% CrI) using validation data. Analyses were performed in R (≥V.4.2.3). Results Out of 400 participants, 73 were infected with HIV (n=16), HCV (n=60), and/or syphilis (n=5). An internally validated submodel with two predictors ( past drug injection , type of past sexually transmitted infection ) displayed the highest AUC (0.79; 89% CrI 0.66 to 0.79), sensitivity (0.85; 89% CrI 0.79 to 0.91) and specificity (0.30; 89% CrI 0.15 to 0.50). The predictor contributing most to STBBI risk was past drug injection (OR=7.62; 89% CrI 4.41 to 13.07). Conclusions This Bayesian-based CRPM is the first to identify high-risk individuals for HIV, HCV and syphilis with an overall good performance that minimises case missing. After additional validation, it could serve as a promising novel tool for prescreening key populations and improve Canadian STBBI multiplexed screening strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.660
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSexually Transmitted InfectionsSame topicReproductive tract infections researchFrench-language works237,207