Smartphone-Based Deep Learning System for Detecting Ractopamine-Fed Pork Using Visual Classification Techniques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ractopamine, a beta-agonist used to enhance lean meat yield, poses health risks with excessive consumption. To comply with global trade policies, Taiwan permits imports of North American (USA. and Canadian) pork containing ractopamine, raising concerns over unclear labeling and potential misidentification as Taiwan pork. Given the high demand for pork, consumers need a reliable way to verify meat authenticity. To address this issue, this study proposes a smartphone-based visual detection system for meat cut and pork origin classification, extending to ractopamine detection. Consumers can use mobile devices in retail settings to analyze pork images and make informed decisions. The system employs a three-stage process: first, applying a black elliptical mask to extract the outer ROI (region of interest) for meat cut classification; then, using a black square mask to obtain the inner ROI for pork origin classification; and finally, determining ractopamine presence in North American pork. Experimental results demonstrate MobileNet's superior accuracy and efficiency, achieving a 96% CR (classification rate) for meat cut classification, a 79.11% average CR and 90.25% F1 score for pork origin classification, and an 80.67% average CR and 80.56% F1 score for ractopamine detection. These findings confirm the system's effectiveness in enhancing meat authenticity verification and market transparency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".