MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409769460 · doi:10.13162/hro-ors.v12i1.5879

Modernizing public health STI and HIV testing services in Ontario: The GetaKit Project

2025· article· en· W4409769460 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Patrick O'Byrne, Lauren Orser, Catherine Watson, Andrée Bourgault, Kira Mandryk, Mia McDonald, Tianxiu Hugh Guan, Nicole Szumlanski, J. Morgenstern, Alexandra Musten, Jennifer Lindsay

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth Reform Observer - Observatoire des Réformes de Santé · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPrimary Care and Health Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Public healthHealth servicesBusinessEnvironmental healthVirologyMedicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In light of increasing rates of sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections (STBBIs) in Canada, as a group comprised primarily of frontline healthcare workers, we undertook a healthcare practice reform in Ontario to establish the first nurse-led asynchronous online STBBI testing platform, known as GetaKit.ca. The website offered clinically indicated testing for STBBIs based on public health guidelines and resources for preventative health services. Services operated in collaboration with public health units, who acted as local ordering providers for STBBI testing and facilitated linkage to care services for persons with positive test results or who required additional health follow-up. Results from the first 12 months of operating GetaKit.ca showed high uptake of this service, with 3,497 orders for STBBI testing from eligible persons, of whom 59% belonged to an equity denied group. A total of 83 new diagnoses (positivity rate of 2.4%) were identified in persons who completed testing via GetaKit.ca, all of whom were linked to treatment and care through their respective health units. We interpret these findings to suggest that our reform was able to expand access to persons with undiagnosed STBBIs. En tant que groupe composé principalement de travailleurs de santé de première ligne confronté à la persistance et à l'augmentation des taux d'infections transmises sexuellement et par le sang (ITSS) au Canada, nous avons entrepris une réforme des pratiques de soins de santé en Ontario afin d'établir la première plateforme asynchrone de dépistage des ITSS en ligne dirigée par des infirmières, connue sous le nom de GetaKit.ca. Le site propose des tests de dépistage des ITSS cliniquement indiqués, basés sur les directives de santé publique, ainsi que des ressources pour les services de santé préventifs. Les services fonctionnent en collaboration avec les agences de santé publique, qui agissent en tant que prestataires locaux et facilitent le lien avec les services de soins pour les personnes dont les résultats de test sont positifs ou qui ont besoin d'un suivi médical supplémentaire. Les résultats des 12 premiers mois de fonctionnement de GetaKit.ca ont montré un taux élevé d'utilisation de ce service, avec 3 497 commandes de tests de dépistage des ITSS pour des personnes éligibles, dont 59 % appartenaient à un groupe défavorisé sur le plan de l'équité. Au total, 83 nouveaux diagnostics (taux de positivité de 2,4 %) ont été identifiés chez les personnes ayant effectué un test via GetaKit.ca, qui se sont toutes vues prescrire un traitement et des soins par l'intermédiaire de leurs unités de santé respectives. Nous interprétons ces résultats comme suggérant que notre réforme a été en mesure d'élargir l'accès aux personnes souffrant d'ITSS non diagnostiquées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.900
Threshold uncertainty score0.725

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.178
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealth Reform Observer - Observatoire des Réformes de SantéSame topicPrimary Care and Health OutcomesFrench-language works237,207