MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409769468 · doi:10.1049/rpg2.70047

Robust Dynamic State Estimation of Power System With Measurement Outliers Based on Parameterized Analytical Cubature Kalman Filter

2025· article· en· W4409769468 on OpenAlexaff
Mingyang Liu, Yanxin Liu, Yi Wang, Venkata Dinavahi, Ze Gao

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Renewable Power Generation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsKalman filterParameterized complexityOutlierComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Moving horizon estimationFast Kalman filterElectric power systemEnsemble Kalman filterState (computer science)Extended Kalman filterMathematicsAlgorithmPower (physics)Artificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Accurate state estimation is paramount for the smooth operation and management of power systems, significantly contributing to their safety, stability, and reliability. However, the presence of channel noise and outliers stemming from phasor measurement units renders as the noise model a deviation from the Gaussian distribution. To mitigate this challenge, this paper introduces a parameterized analytical update cubature Kalman filter (PACKF) that significantly enhances estimation accuracy. Firstly, the updated analytical form of the state variable is derived, in which an unknown parameter is introduced. Secondly, the unknown parameter is approximated using fixed‐point iteration, followed by the analytical computation of the required joint posterior probability density function (PDF). Finally, extensive simulations are conducted on the IEEE 39‐bus test system, indicating that the proposed method commendable accuracy and efficiency across diverse scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Renewable Power GenerationSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207