MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409786311 · doi:10.70962/cis2025abstract.173

HLH-like Hypersensitivity Reaction Secondary to Prolonged Piperacillin/Tazobactam: A Case Series

2025· article· en· W4409786311 on OpenAlex
C Martín, Clément Triaille, Philippe Bégin, François Graham, Philippe Ovetchkine, Louis Paradis, Kathryn Samaan, Stéphanie Tremblay, Fabien Touzot, Marie‐Paule Morin, Roxane Labrosse

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Human Immunity · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPiperacillin/tazobactamPiperacillinTazobactamHypersensitivity reactionMedicineDermatologyImmunologyBacteriaBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Prolonged (>10 days) use of intravenous (IV) piperacillin/tazobactam has been associated with a risk of developing hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) syndrome. However, clinical and biological descriptions of this rare complication are lacking in the literature, such as management guidelines. Objectives and Methods We describe a series of five children who presented with an HLH-like hypersensitivity reaction after prolonged use of IV piperacillin/tazobactam therapy between February 2024 and October 2024 in a single pediatric tertiary center. Results Five patients aged between 6 and 15 years received IV piperacillin/tazobactam for various bacterial infections. The reaction occurred between 7 and 19 days after the start of therapy. While initial infections were well controlled, all patients presented with a reoccurrence of high fever, malaise, and a maculopapular rash in 4 of them. All developed biological abnormalities with elevated ferritin (range: 913-124895 µg/L), LDH (range: 565-3130 U/L), liver enzymes (ALT range: 113-363 U/L), and severe neutropenia (range: 0.1-0.4 x 109/L). Eosinophils were normal in 4/5 and mildly elevated (0.8 x 109/L) in 1/5. Increased HLADR+ CD8+ T cell frequency was observed in 3/3 patients tested (range: 25-30%). Investigations for classical secondary HLH triggers were negative. Piperacillin/tazobactam discontinuation led to resolution of fever and associated symptoms within 24 hours in all patients. All biological features resolved within a few days. Only one child received a short course of steroids for severe pruritus and myalgia. One patient reported a similar reaction after a previous course of 14 days of piperacillin/tazobactam therapy, 1.5 years earlier. Four patients were evaluated in allergology: 1/4 reacted to intradermal testing for piperacillin/tazobactam. Patch tests and one dose provocation challenge were negative (tested in 4 and 2 patients, respectively). Conclusion We provide further evidence that prolonged use of IV piperacillin/tazobactam may be associated with hypersensitivity reactions reminiscent of HLH (although only 1/5 formally fulfilled HLH-2004 criteria). We propose the term of HLH-like hypersensitivity reactions. Usual allergy testing is not useful to the diagnosis. Spontaneous resolution of symptoms can be expected after discontinuation of piperacillin/tazobactam. Clinicians should be aware of this rare disorder to avoid overtreatment or unnecessary investigations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.870
Threshold uncertainty score0.733

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it