MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

55. Evaluation of Poly(styrene-b-isobutylene-b-styrene) (SIBS) as an Alternative to Silicone for Biomaterial Applications

2025· article· en· W4409786460 on OpenAlexaff
Nikita Kalashnikov, Joshua Vorstenbosch

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
Topicbiodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsobutyleneBiomaterialStyreneSiliconePolymer scienceMaterials scienceSilicone oilPolymer chemistryComposite materialNanotechnologyCopolymerPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Silicone - namely poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) - has numerous applications in surgery, ranging from hydrocephalus shunts and gastric bands to craniofacial prostheses and breast implants. Despite its widespread use, PDMS can induce a strong foreign body response with fibrous encapsulation that can lead to pain, discomfort and implantable device failure. Poly(styrene-block-isobutylene-block-styrene) (SIBS) is a silicon-deficient elastomer clinically used in ocular and vascular implants. Although SIBS has demonstrated excellent biocompatibility in these applications, we lack understanding of the foreign body response induced by SIBS in more immunological active tissues. Here, we compare the physicochemical properties of SIBS with those of PDMS and evaluate the biocompatibility of both biomaterials using in vitro macrophage and fibroblast cell culture models. METHODS: We first performed tensile testing, profilometry and contact angle goniometry to characterize the stiffness, roughness and wettability of SIBS and PDMS. Then, we differentiated THP-1 cell line monocytes into macrophages, cultured them on these biomaterials and assessed their phenotype using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for expression of inflammatory, anti-inflammatory and fibrotic genes. To study how SIBS and PDMS can indirectly influence fibroblast phenotype and contractility via macrophages, we treated fibroblast cultures on tissue culture polystyrene (TCPS) and in collagen gels with SIBS-/PDMS-macrophage conditioned media. Results. Both biomaterials demonstrated comparable physicochemical properties (data not shown). Expression of CXCL8, TNF and TGFB1 genes were significantly different for macrophages, while fibroblasts displayed a more pronounced senescence-associated secretory phenotype and were less contractile when exposed to SIBS-macrophage conditioned media. CONCLUSIONS: Although SIBS was globally similar to PDMS in terms of physical properties, it did however biologically stimulate macrophages to drive fibroblasts towards a more senescent phenotype, suggesting that SIBS might induce less fibrosis than PDMS and could thus be a favorable biomaterial substitute for silicone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global OpenSame topicbiodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesFrench-language works237,207