Spatio-temporal Evolution and Influence Mechanism of Rural Tourism Flows Based on Network Data Mining
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rural tourism, as an important part of the tourism service industry, the study of the spatio-temporal evolution and influence mechanism of rural tourism flow has also become a hot topic at present.This paper takes Jiangsu Province of China as the research area, proposes the heat measurement and identification method of rural tourism based on network data, constructs a heat measurement model, takes standard deviation ellipse analysis, average nearest neighbor index method, kernel density analysis as the core method of spatial analysis, and proposes the hotspot identification method on the demand of spatial relevance analysis, so as to provide the method and means for the analysis of the spatio-temporal evolution of the rural tourism flow.In the analysis of the influence mechanism of rural tourism flow, the QAP model is used as a research tool to explore the influencing factors of rural tourism flow.The value of rural tourism hotness was low during 2014-2017, and it has rapidly increased and maintained a high growth trend since 2018.The Gini coefficient of rural tourism hotness increased from 0.51 in 2014 to 0.72 in 2018, and then fell back to 0.65 in 2023, and the degree of spatial difference of rural tourism hotness showed a weakening trend, and the hotspot areas of rural tourism were increasing.The structure of tourism flow is affected by a variety of factors such as spatial proximity, tourism income, and the impacts produced by the factors change somewhat in different time periods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".