Study on the accurate calculation method for the distribution of structural residual bearing capacity during the demolition process of the Clearwater River Bridge
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bridges as the basic transportation facilities in the national daily life, with the development of road transportation, the number of urban viaducts and cross-sea bridges grows year by year, and the role of bridges in the transportation network becomes more and more significant.The article selects the Qingshuihe Bridge demolition project as the research object, and designs the Qingshuihe Bridge demolition implementation program based on the engineering characteristics.For the mechanical property changes and structural residual bearing capacity calculation during the demolition process of Qingshuihe Bridge, this paper constructs a finite element model of Qingshuihe Bridge based on ANSYS software, and analyzes the structural reliability of Qingshuihe Bridge after the demolition project by combining with structural reliability indexes.Under the same mid-span displacement condition, the cracking load error between the finite element simulation values and the experimental values is relatively small, and its fluctuation range is between 2.12%% and 6.58%.In the first 5 years after the demolition of the bridge section, the residual load capacity of the bridge structure increased from 5.23*103kN to 5.51*103kN.The reliability index value of the bridge over the Qingshui River changed relatively slowly in the early stage, and began to decline gradually in the later stage, and the greater the strength of the steel girders the higher time-varying reliability index of the bridge over the Qingshui River.In this paper, the design of the Qingshui River bridge demolition implementation program has a strong feasibility, in order to ensure that the Qingshui River bridge structural residual bearing capacity on the basis of the completion of the demolition of part of the bridge abutment, and can guarantee the safety of the bridge operation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".