Curriculum Design and Learning Path in Grassland Ecological Study Tour Based on Support Vector Machine and Decision Tree Optimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the in-depth promotion of ecological civilization education, the grassland natural ecology study course has become an important way to realize the comprehensive development of students.The article takes the design idea of grassland study course as the entry point, analyzes the design links of grassland ecology study course development, and proposes the design process of grassland ecology study course development based on this.Taking the second grade students of the first middle school in X city as the research object, the decision tree algorithm is used to optimize the relevant variables in the development of the grassland ecological study course, and the optimization model of the study path of the grassland ecological study course is established starting from the shortest distance and the least time.Based on the variables optimized by the decision tree algorithm, a DT-SVM model is built by combining the support vector mechanism to solve the learning path of the grassland ecological study course.Through the simulation and example data, it can be seen that the convergence accuracy of the DT-SVM algorithm shows the optimal accuracy under all experiments, and its mean value can be up to 3.652, and the average time consumed for obtaining the optimal learning path of the grassland ecology research course is only about 3.17min.And more than 65% of the students agreed with the teaching effect of the grassland ecology study course.The grassland ecology study course can significantly improve students' core literacy in geography, enhance their independent living skills, and better realize the school's teaching goal of promoting moral education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".