MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409793587 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127a-240

Functional Design and Development of Smart Temperature Regulating Clothing Based on Artificial Intelligence

2025· article· en· W4409793587 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Media and Visual Art
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClothingArchitectural engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringSystems engineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intelligent thermoregulation clothing as a new type of functional clothing, the design and development of which is receiving more and more attention.PID algorithm, as a kind of classical control algorithm, realizes the precise control of the clothing temperature regulation system by adjusting the three parameters of proportionality, integration and differentiation.The control system is firstly constructed according to the principle of PID control.Then the PID controller parameters are optimized by BP neural network to improve the response speed and stability of the temperature control system.Finally, the intelligent thermoregulation garment with physical therapy and health care and portable storage is designed.Experimental verification of the parameter self-tuning PID control based on BP neural network, the BP neural network can make the temperature better maintained near the set value, the control effect is more satisfactory.The final design of the smart thermoregulation garment has a body surface temperature retention rate of 98.35% after 30 minutes at -10C and with the heating function on.The thermal sensation evaluation of the intelligent thermoregulation garment by the subjects in different states is concentrated between "0-2", indicating that the garment can play a more ideal temperature control effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.628
Threshold uncertainty score0.790

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicDigital Media and Visual ArtFrench-language works237,207