Research on Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education Based on Experimental Research under Artificial Intelligence Technology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the rapid development of science and technology, in the face of the needs of social development, colleges and universities undoubtedly need to shoulder the important task of talent training and education reform in innovation and entrepreneurship.In this paper, an intelligent learning model is constructed by using artificial intelligence technology.The model takes the subject knowledge graph as the core support, and combines the learning path recommendation algorithm to provide digital and intelligent support for innovation and entrepreneurship education.On this basis, the objectives of innovation and entrepreneurship education are formulated, and the framework of innovation and entrepreneurship education system is established based on the intelligent learning model in this paper, and the cycle model of innovation and entrepreneurship education based on the intelligent learning model is proposed, and the model is experimentally studied.The AUC values and F1 values of the proposed algorithm in the three datasets are higher than 0.85 and 0.80.Compared with the traditional model, the average value of recommendation bias decreased by 8.56, and the evaluation satisfaction increased by 0.126.In the teaching experiment, the overall average score of the innovation and entrepreneurship education model based on this paper was 4.364, which was 1.129 higher than before.Compared with the traditional innovation and entrepreneurship education, it is increased by 0.693, indicating that the innovation and entrepreneurship education model in this paper can promote the all-round development of students' ability level and play a positive guiding role in the development and reform of innovation and entrepreneurship education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.024 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".