MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409793697 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127a-212

Research on Optimization Techniques for Target Tracking in Video Image Signal Processing Based on Multiscale Convolutional Neural Networks

2025· article· en· W4409793697 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvolutional neural networkComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer visionTracking (education)Image processingImage (mathematics)SIGNAL (programming language)Signal processingPattern recognition (psychology)Digital signal processingComputer hardwarePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Target tracking is a fundamental task in the field of computer vision, which has a wide range of applications in real-life video image signal processing.This paper proposes target tracking optimization technique based on the principle of multi-scale convolutional neural network and multitarget tracking algorithm.The basic structure is designed using VGG16 network, the ROI align method is used to reduce the number of features for feature fusion, and the improved Hungarian algorithm is adopted to associate the fused features and obtain the target tracking results.In the tracking performance experiments, the target tracking optimization technique in this paper is more discriminative in terms of extracted features, and also has higher tracking results under challenging factors such as background clustering (BC), scale variation (SV), and out-of-view (OV).As for the target tracking experiments on mobile network video images, the average tracking accuracy and average tracking success rate of this paper's method are 97.89% and 96.02%, which are better than DS_v2 and FFT16, and the average error between the target tracking results and the target's actual motion trajectory is 4.12mm, while possessing the smallest error amplitude.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score0.780

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicAdvanced Algorithms and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207