MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409795009 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127b-474

Optimization research on smoke prevention and exhaust system for air-bearing membrane structure buildings

2025· article· en· W4409795009 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Safety, and Science Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSmokeBearing (navigation)Environmental scienceWaste managementEngineeringComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to its advantages in energy conservation, emission reduction and recyclability, air-supported membrane structure (ASMS) has been widely implemented in various applications, including large stadiums, conference centers, warehouses and temporary buildings.Compared to traditional building, the structural and material properties of ASMS are special which significantly affect smoke diffusion and flow behavior during fire scenarios.Moreover, the design methods for smoke management system of ASMS buildings are still lacked and further research is required.In this study, a numerical model of a coal storage bin was built.The impact of several key design parameters, including such as height of natural smoke vent, fire source location and makeup air methods, on the performance of ASMS building`s smoke management system were evaluated.Gas temperature, CO concentration, visibility, smoke exhausting quantity, critical pyrolysis temperature and critical heat radiation intensity were selected as evaluation indexes.The results indicated that better natural smoke exhaust efficiency was achieved when the natural smoke vents were located at the height between 80% and 100% of the building's total height.Setting natural makeup air vent in the wall of smoke bay 3 can achieve the best cooling effect.However, compared to natural makeup air, the natural smoke exhaust efficiency of mechanical makeup air was much better.When the rate of mechanical makeup air reached 120% of the required natural smoke exhausting quantity, it has significant improvements in temperature reduction, visibility and natural smoke exhausting quantity which are crucial for ensuring safe evacuation during fire events.These findings provide a design refer for enhancing fire protection and construction practices in ASMS buildings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it