MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409795141 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127b-391

Algorithm Optimization and Innovative Design of Digital Inheritance System for Miao Family Weaving Handicraft in South Sichuan Province

2025· article· en· W4409795141 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicE-commerce and Technology Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of China
KeywordsWeavingHandicraftInheritance (genetic algorithm)GeographyEngineeringGenealogyArchaeologyHistoryMechanical engineeringBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the maturity of digital display technology, its application scope is also more and more extensive, and there are more and more application cases in the protection and inheritance of minority hand-weaving skills.This paper builds a general framework for the design of the digital inheritance system for the handloom weaving techniques of the Miao family in southern Sichuan, and applies three-dimensional modeling technology, three-dimensional animation technology, digital imaging technology and interactive interface design to complete the preliminary establishment of the digital display system for the handloom weaving techniques of the Miao people in southern Sichuan.Combined with the information dissemination characteristics of mobile intelligent terminals, relevant improvement programs are proposed.At the same time, the optimization and improvement of the digital display system is further improved to meet the needs of users.Comparing the users' experience and perception of the digital display system, the system designed in this paper is superior to R-Space in terms of functional scope and technology, and the average score of the system designed in this paper is 4.193, which is higher than the score of 3.985 of the R-Space system, and the system designed in this paper has a higher score.At the same time, the user's satisfaction with the system's interactivity is more stable in the three aspects of login start, system home page, and Chuannan humanities resources.In the login start, the scores of very satisfied, more satisfied, and general are 2, 3, and 2.5 respectively, which indicates that the user's experience of this paper's system is better.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score0.809

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicE-commerce and Technology InnovationsFrench-language works237,207