MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409795146 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127b-529

Research on Translation System Based on cloud Computing Data Aggregation Algorithm

2025· article· en· W4409795146 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Technology and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJilin Engineering Normal University
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingTranslation (biology)AlgorithmDistributed computingOperating systemChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Artificial intelligence technology has brought new breakthroughs to the field of machine translation.Through the introduction of cloud computing data aggregation algorithms, this paper proposes two translation methods, namely rules and corpus.At the same time, the translation system is studied with English as the research object.Based on the statistical translation method, the basic framework of the English translation system (ETS) is designed, including a preprocessing module, a source language matching module, a statistical decoding module, and a target translation generation module.And by introducing the k-means algorithm and the optimized k-means++ algorithm, ETS was studied.Combined with cloud computing technology, the ETS had a powerful data storage platform.Finally, a simulation experiment was carried out to test the performance of the system from three aspects: the average number and type of translation results, the success rate of translation in different languages, and the speed of online translation.First, the comparison method of the two algorithms was used to test them separately.The data showed that with the increase of vocabulary, the average number and types of translation results in the ETS have also increased.The system developed by k-means++ algorithm was 5.03 items higher than the average number of translation results of the system developed by k-means algorithm, and 1.93 items higher than the average number of categories.When testing the success rate of translation in six languages, the data showed that the average success rate of English translation in different languages remained at 94.34%.It was concluded that the success rate of using k-means++ was higher than that of k-means algorithm, and the k-means++ algorithm could make the translation system produce better results when running.Finally, the online translation speed of the common ETS and the ETS based on cloud computing technology were tested.The average online translation speed of the system under cloud computing technology was 40.46b/s under different translated text volumes, while the average online translation speed of the common system was 26.47b/s.It indicates that the efficiency of the ETS on the basis of cloud computing technology is high and the data processing capability is strong, which makes the system far more efficient than the ordinary translation system in operation and has obvious superiority.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.874
Threshold uncertainty score0.958

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicEducational Technology and PedagogyFrench-language works237,207