MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Innate Memory Responses

2025· review· en· W4409797387 on OpenAlex
Musa M. Mhlanga, Stephanie Fanucchi, Mumin Ozturk, Maziar Divangahi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnual Review of Immunology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune responses and vaccinations
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéLEO FondetNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesFondation LeducqBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
KeywordsEpigeneticsBiologyInnate immune systemNeuroscienceImmunityChromatinAcquired immune systemImmune systemEpigenesisImmunologyDNA methylationGeneticsDNAGene expressionGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There has been an increasing effort to understand the memory responses of a complex interplay among innate, adaptive, and structural cells in peripheral organs and bone marrow. Trained immunity is coined as the de facto memory of innate immune cells and their progenitors. These cells acquire epigenetic modifications and shift their metabolism to equip an imprinted signature to a persistent fast-responsive functional state. Recent studies highlight the contribution of noncoding RNAs and modulation of chromatin structures in establishing this epigenetic readiness for potential immune perturbations. In this review, we discuss recent studies that highlight trained immunity-mediated memory responses emerging intrinsically in innate immune cells and as a complex interplay with other cells at the organ level. Lastly, we survey epigenetic contributors to trained immunity phenotypes-specifically, a recently discovered regulatory circuit coordinating the regulation of a key driver of trained immunity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.877
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it