MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4409797724 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0321446

Bacterial expression, purification and folding of exceptionally hydrophobic and essential protein: Surfactant Protein-B (SP-B)

2025· article· en· W4409797724 on OpenAlexafffund
Tadiwos G. Asrat, Donna M. Jackman, Valerie Booth

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPulmonary surfactantEscherichia coliRecombinant DNAInclusion bodiesFusion proteinBiologyProtein ABiochemistryChemistryMicrobiologyAntibodyGeneImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lung Surfactant Protein B (SP-B) is essential for life. It is thus striking that, to this point, no method for making the full-length protein has been published and consequently we lack detailed understanding of SP-B's basic structure-function relationships, as well as an inability to make it for clinical use. The major challenge in producing SP-B lies with its exceptionally hydrophobic nature. In this work, we present a method to produce recombinant SP-B in bacteria that can be used to make the full-length protein as well as the product focused on here, which is a construct lacking the N-terminal 7 residues, rSP-B (Δ7NTC48S-SP-B-6His). The construct is produced as a fusion to Staphylococcus nuclease A (SN) in Escherichia coli C43 cells, a strain known to promote production of toxic and membrane recombinant proteins. After cleavage from SN, rSP-B is folded on column and then exchanged into the lipid or detergent system of choice. rSP-B prepared in this way exhibits the correct secondary structure and demonstrates surface activity. The yield obtained is 0.3 mg of purified rSP-B (Δ7NTC48S-SP-B-6His) per liter of initial bacterial culture. We expect this method for producing SP-B will be valuable in enabling basic research into SP-B's mechanisms, as well as possibly facilitating the inclusion of SP-B in lung surfactant formulations to treat common and frequently fatal lung conditions and in lung surfactant-based drug delivery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONE→Same topicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research→French-language works237,207→