MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409799861 · doi:10.11159/iceptp25.112

Ecological Risk Assessment of Contaminants of Emerging Concern inCoastal Waters of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates

2025· article· en· W4409799861 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lucy Semerjian, Salima Aissaoui, Abdallah Shanableh, Mohammad H. Semreen, Khaled Abass

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality and Pollution Assessment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Sharjah
KeywordsRisk assessmentContaminationEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental protectionEnvironmental planningEcologyComputer scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The current study assesses the ecological risks of contaminants of emerging concern in the coastal aquatic environment of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates receiving treated effluents from wastewater treatment plants.Twenty-one contaminants were detected in wastewater effluents, 23 in seawater, and 22 in sediments at concentrations varying between trace amounts to 1782 ng L -1 , (wastewater), 236.10 ng L -1 (seawater), and 60.15 ng g -1 (sediments).Imidacloprid, thiabendazole, and acetaminophen were identified as the most prevalent compounds in effluents, seawater, and sediments, respectively.Ecological risk assessment was conducted using the risk quotient methodology and for various trophic levels, including algae, crustacea (Daphnia), and fish.Most contaminants posed low risks; however, sulphathiazole presented a medium risk, and imidacloprid, ofloxacin, and isoproturon exhibited a high risk to aquatic life, with imidacloprid showing the highest risk quotient.Recorded outcomes reveal the priority contaminants of emerging concern as well as suggest the need for enhanced wastewater treatment processes to reduce the ecological risks associated with such emerging contaminants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental EngineeringSame topicWater Quality and Pollution AssessmentFrench-language works237,207