Bioflocculant from Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides for the treatment of waters from the Moche River
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The exponential increase in the contamination of our water resources is alarming.Water is essential for human life, so it is necessary to recover it through ecological treatments, such as bioflocculants.In this context, the present study aimed to evaluate the bioflocculant activity of dextran from Leuconostoc pseudomensenteroides in treating water from the Moche River.For this purpose, sugarcane juice was used and sown on potato sucrose agar (PSA) in a selective medium, where characteristic colonies of the genus Leuconostoc sp. were observed, with a shiny, rubbery appearance.Molecular identification confirmed 100% that it was the Leucnostoc pseudomensenteroides strain.The flocculating activity of dextran was evaluated using doses of 5, 20, and 40 ppm.During the process, a fast speed of 180 rpm and slow speeds of 50 to 70 rpm were applied.In addition, we observed that the maximum flocculation activity was obtained at a pH of 9 and a concentration of 40 ppm of dextran, with a fast-stirring speed of 180 rpm for 5 min and a slow stirring speed of 70 rpm for 15 min.This procedure achieved an 88.0% removal of the turbidity in the waters of the Moche River.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it