MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409803366 · doi:10.1097/pcc.0000000000003743

The Prevalence and Outcome of Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure (PANDORA) Study in Mechanically Ventilated Children: Prospective Multicenter Epidemiology in Spain, 2019–2021

2025· article· en· W4409803366 on OpenAlexaff
Yolanda M. López‐Fernández, Amelia Martínez de Azagra‐Garde, Susana Reyes, Ana Gómez-Zamora, Laura Herrera-Castillo, Ana Coca-Pérez, Julio Parrilla-Parrilla, Alberto Pedro Lorandi Medina, J.P. García Íñiguez, Marta Brezmes-Raposo, Alexandra Hernández-Yuste, Ana María Llorente de la Fuente, I. Ibarra de la Rosa, José S. León‐González, Javier Trastoy‐Quintela, David Arjona-Villanueva, Jesús M. González‐Martín, Tamás Szakmány, Jesús Villar

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Critical Care Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMechanical ventilationEpidemiologyAcute respiratory distressProspective cohort studyInternal medicineEmergency medicineLung

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: To describe the epidemiology and outcome of children with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) and/or pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS). DESIGN: Prospective, observational study in six nonconsecutive 2-month blocks form October 2019 to September 2021. SETTING: A network of 22 PICUs in Spain. PATIENTS: Consecutive children (7 d to 15 yr old) with a diagnosis of AHRF, defined by Pa o2 /F io2 ratio less than or equal to 300 mm Hg, who needed invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) using positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) greater than or equal to 5 cm H 2 O and F io2 greater than or equal to 0.3. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcomes were AHRF prevalence and PICU mortality. The secondary outcomes were the prevalence of IMV with PARDS (IMV-PARDS) and the use of adjunctive therapies. There were 6545 PICU admissions: 1374 (21%) underwent IMV and 181 (2.8%) had AHRF. Ninety-one patients (1.4% of PICU admissions, 6.6% of IMV cases, and 50.3% of AHRF cases) met the Second Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference IMV-PARDS criteria. At baseline, mean (± sd ) tidal volume was 7.4 ± 1.8 mL/kg ideal body weight, PEEP 8.4 ± 3.1 cm H 2 O, F io2 0.68 ± 0.23, and plateau pressure 25.7 ± 6.3 cm H 2 O. Unlike patients with PARDS, adjunctive therapies were used infrequently in non-PARDS AHRF patients. AHRF patients without PARDS had more ventilator-free days than PARDS patients (16.4 ± 9.4 vs. 11.2 ± 10.5; p = 0.002). All-cause PICU mortality in AHRF cases was higher in PARDS vs. non-PARDS patients (30.8% [95% CI, 21.5-41.3] vs. (14.4% [95% CI, 7.9-23.4]; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In our 2019-2021 PICU population, the prevalence of AHRF is 2.8% of IMV cases. Of such patients, the prevalence of PARDS was 50.3%, and there was a 30.8% mortality, which was higher than in cases of AHRF without PARDS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric Critical Care MedicineSame topicRespiratory Support and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207