MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409805008 · doi:10.1128/msphere.00090-25

Host-specific microbiome-rumination interactions shape methane-yield phenotypes in dairy cattle

2025· article· en· W4409805008 on OpenAlexaff
Alicia Castañeda, Nagaraju Indugu, Kathryn Lenker, Kapil Singh Narayan, Sarah Rassler, Joseph S. Bender, Linda D. Baker, Ojas Purandare, David Chai, Xin Zhao, Dipti Pitta

Bibliographic record

VenuemSphere · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsMethanogenesisRumenMicrobiomeBiologyPrevotellaNitrite reductaseFood scienceFermentationLachnospiraceaeBacteriaAnimal scienceDefaunationMethanogenMicrobiologyNitrate reductaseEcologyNitrateBioinformaticsFirmicutesGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Enteric methane emissions (EMEs) negatively impact both the environment and livestock efficiency. Given the proposed link between CH 4 yield and the rumination time (RT) phenotype, we hypothesize that this connection is mediated by the gut microbiome. This study investigated the RT-microbiome-EME connection using rumination-bolus, fecal, and rumen microbiomes as non-invasive proxies for identifying low-EME cows. High-RT cows ruminated 94 minutes longer per day (20%) and exhibited 26% lower EME than low-RT cows, confirming a strong RT-CH 4 -yield association. Microbial analysis revealed conserved methanogen diversity across the rumen, bolus, and fecal microbiomes, though functional differences were evident. High-RT cows had a greater abundance of Methanosphaera stadtmanae , suggesting an increased potential for methylotrophic methanogenesis, whereas low-RT cows exhibited higher Methanobrevibacter YE315 abundance, indicative of CO 2 -utilizing methanogenesis. Additionally, high-RT cows showed increased alternative hydrogen sinks, supported by upregulated genes encoding fumarate reductase, sulfate reductase, nitrate reductase, and ammonia-forming nitrite reductase, thereby reducing hydrogen availability for methanogenesis. Metabolically, high-RT cows had higher propionate concentrations and were enriched with rapid-fermenting bacteria ( Prevotella , Sharpea , Veillonellaceae , and Succinivibrionaceae ), whereas low-RT cows exhibited higher acetate concentrations with elevated acetate-producing pathways, reflecting differences in energy partitioning mechanisms. This study establishes RT as a microbiome-linked, non-invasive screening tool for identifying low-EME cows. The observed microbial and metabolic shifts in high-RT cows suggest that RT-based selection could enhance methane mitigation, rumen efficiency, and climate-smart livestock production. Leveraging RT-associated microbial profiles offers a scalable and cost-effective approach to reducing EME in cattle. IMPORTANCE Methane emissions from livestock contribute to climate change and reduce animal efficiency. This study reveals that cows with longer rumination times (chewing cud for an extra 94 minutes daily) produce 26% less methane than cows with shorter rumination times. The gut microbiome plays a key role—low-methane cows host microbial communities that produce less methane while efficiently utilizing hydrogen for energy conservation in the rumen. By analyzing rumination sensor data and/or in combination with microbial profiles from rumen or fecal samples, farmers can non-invasively identify and select cows that naturally emit less methane. This scalable, cost-effective strategy offers a practical solution for reducing livestock’s environmental footprint while enhancing efficiency and advancing climate-smart agriculture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemSphereSame topicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207