MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409812663 · doi:10.1186/s12883-025-04156-x

Abnormalities of regional brain activity in patients with asymptomatic internal carotid artery occlusion: a resting-state fMRI study

2025· article· en· W4409812663 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Renjie Ji, Chunlan Deng, Jianxin Zhang, Ziqi Xu, Zeqi Hao, Benyan Luo

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Neurology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineResting state fMRIAsymptomaticNeurologyNeurochemistryNeurosurgeryInternal carotid arteryCardiologyNeuroradiologyInternal medicineOcclusionCarotid arteriesNeuroscienceRadiologyPsychiatryPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Asymptomatic internal carotid artery occlusion (aICAO) disrupts cerebral blood flow and can impair brain function. While previous research has primarily focused on abnormal functional connectivity between brain networks or regions in aICAO patients, less is known about specific regional brain activity alterations. This study investigated changes in local brain activity and their associations with cognitive function in patients with aICAO. METHODS: A total of 26 unilateral patients with aICAO without MRI lesions and 25 matched healthy controls (HCs) underwent resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging and neuropsychological assessment. Local brain activity in patients with aICAO was investigated using percentage amplitude of fluctuation (PerAF) and degree centrality (DC). The association between the abnormal regional brain activity in patients with aICAO and cognitive function was also explored. RESULTS: Compared with HCs, patients with aICAO showed decreased PerAF in the ipsilateral (occlusion side, right) superior temporal gyrus (temporal pole), ipsilateral inferior frontal gyrus (triangular part). In addition, decreased DC was detected in the ipsilateral cuneus of patients with aICAO, while increased DC was observed in the contralateral (opposite to occlusion side, left) precuneus and contralateral inferior frontal gyrus (triangular part) among patients with aICAO. Furthermore, the DC value of contralateral precuneus in aICAO group was negatively correlated with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (r = -0.612, p = 0.002), Forward Digit Span Test (FDST) (r = -0.677, p = 0.001), and Backward Digit Span Test (BDST) (r = -0.531, p = 0.011) scores. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings revealed abnormal local spontaneous brain activity within brain regions associated with cognitive functions in patients with unilateral aICAO. Notably, some of these abnormalities correlated with their cognitive impairments. This study contributes to the understanding of potential neural mechanisms underlying cognitive dysfunction in unilateral aICAO patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.660

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC NeurologySame topicNeurological Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207