MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409815641 · doi:10.1177/13670069251335838

Impact of early bilingualism on perception and production of new sounds of a third language in young children

2025· article· en· W4409815641 on OpenAlexaff
Noémie Germain, Kirsten M. Hummel

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Bilingualism · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicLanguage Development and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroscience of multilingualismPsychologyPerceptionProduction (economics)LinguisticsDevelopmental psychologyCognitive psychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims and objectives: In this study, we examine the discrimination and the pronunciation of new Spanish and Mandarin phonemes in French–English bilingual children in first and second grades compared with French-speaking monolingual children of the same grades. Design/methodology/approach: We recruited 18 French–English bilingual children and 27 French-speaking monolingual children in first or second grade in elementary schools. They were asked to carry out discrimination and word repetition tasks from audio files recorded by a Colombian Spanish speaker and a Chinese Mandarin speaker. Data and analysis: For discrimination tasks, we calculated two measures: the percentage of success in the discrimination of two Spanish rhotics (/r/-/ɾ/) and the percentage of success in the discrimination of the set of Mandarin phonological contrasts (/p-p h /, /t-t h /, /k-k h /, /ʂ-ɕ/, /ts-ts h /, /tʂ-tʂ h / and /tɕ-tɕ h /). For word repetition tasks, pronunciation was assessed for accuracy and foreign accent by native Spanish and Mandarin speakers. We completed our analyses with measures of voice onset time (VOT) values of Mandarin stops in word initial position (in milliseconds). Findings and conclusions: The results of our study showed that the members of the bilingual group were neither advantaged nor disadvantaged compared with the monolingual group. Our findings suggest that specific exposure to the characteristics intrinsic to an L3 is necessary for mastering new sounds in an L3. Originality: This study examines whether early bilingualism facilitates the perception and the pronunciation of new sounds in an L3 in young bilingual (French–English) children. Few studies have examined this issue in this age group, that is, 6- to 9-year-old children. In addition, unlike other studies that analyzed oral production in speech, we chose to focus on the pronunciation of sounds in isolated words. Significance: Our study highlights that no significant differences between bilingual and monolingual children were revealed. These results contribute to an understanding of whether there are bilingual advantages in L3 phonological acquisition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score0.534

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of BilingualismSame topicLanguage Development and DisordersFrench-language works237,207