MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract CT074: Discovery and preliminary clinical findings of MK-6598, a potent and selective inhibitor of the immune checkpoint IL4I1

2025· article· en· W4409822130 on OpenAlexaff
Dagmar Hess, Nicolas Mach, Rahima Jamal, Anastasios Stathis, Steven Powell, Markus Joerger, Andrey Loboda, Yao Chen, Stuart D. Shumway, Erik H. Knelson, Lillian L. Siu

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmune systemPharmacologyImmune checkpointBiologyMedicineImmunologyImmunotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Therapeutic blockade of PD-1:PD-L1/L2 interactions is effective in many cancers, particularly those with pre-existing inflammation and T cell infiltration. We identified a correlation between high interleukin 4 induced 1 (IL4I1) gene expression within the tumor micorenvironment (TME) of tumors and response to the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab (pembro). IL4I1 protein is secreted by myeloid and tumor cells into the extracellular TME where it generates hydrogen peroxide upon deamination of amino acid substrates, primarily L-phenylalanine to phenylpyruvate. At IL4I1 concentrations similar to those measured in human tumors, hydrogen peroxide generated by IL4I1 is cytotoxic to T cells in vitro and suppresses T cell responses in mixed lymphocyte reactions. These data collectively support an immunosuppressive role of IL4I1 in the TME. Small molecule inhibitory ligands of IL4I1 have not been previously described. Chemical optimization led to the discovery of MK-6598, which has an IC50 of 16 nM against recombinant IL4I1 in a biochemical assay and exhibits a robust PK/PD relationship based on tumor phenylpyruvate concentrations in mouse models. Mixed lymphocyte reactions and ex vivo organoids were used to validate the target and mechanism of action of MK-6598 in preclinical models. The phase 1 MK-6598-001 dose escalation study (NCT05594043) was designed to assess the safety, tolerability, PK, and antitumor activity of MK-6598 administered orally at four doses from 50-500 mg once daily as monotherapy (arm 1) or in combination with pembro 200 mg administered intravenously every 3 weeks in participants (pts) with previously treated advanced solid tumors. 20 pts received MK-6598 alone in arm 1, and 19 received MK-6598 plus pembro in arm 2. Median age was 62 y. Of the 20 tumor types represented, ovarian and colorectal were the most common (n=6 each). There were no dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) in the monotherapy arm and 3 DLTs observed in the pembro combination arm (grade 3 maculopapular rash, grade 3 Stevens-Johnson syndrome [recovered], and delay in dosing due to grade 1 fever). MK-6598 plasma concentrations increased with dose and were above the predicted IC70 for all pts and the predicted IC90 for >80% of pts. Tumor biopsies were performed at baseline and predose at cycle 2 day 1 (C2D1) to quantitatively assess IL4I1 protein and phenylpyruvate by mass spectrometry. Evidence of IL4I1 inhibition was illustrated by reductions in tumor phenylpyruvate at C2D1 in >90% of pts, with reductions >50% observed in >60% of pts. The only response was in a pt with mismatch repair-deficient endometrial cancer that progressed on prior pembro achieved a partial response after crossing over from MK-6598 monotherapy to MK-6598 plus pembro. These data suggest that despite its ability to inhibit IL4I1 protein, MK-6598 has limited antitumor activity as monotherapy or in combination with pembro in pts with previously treated advanced solid tumors. Citation Format: Dagmar Hess, Nicolas Mach, Rahima Jamal, Anastasios Stathis, Steven F. Powell, Markus Joerger, Andrey Loboda, Yao Chen, Stuart Shumway, Erik H. Knelson, Lillian L. Siu. Discovery and preliminary clinical findings of MK-6598, a potent and selective inhibitor of the immune checkpoint IL4I1 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_2):Abstract nr CT074.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers→French-language works237,207→