MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409823778 · doi:10.1002/jcsm.13815

Myo‐Guide: A Machine Learning‐Based Web Application for Neuromuscular Disease Diagnosis With MRI

2025· article· en· W4409823778 on OpenAlexaff
José Verdú-Díaz, Carla Bolano-Diaz, A. Gonzalez-Chamorro, S. Fitzsimmons, Jodi Warman‐Chardon, G. Kocak, Debora Mucida‐Alvim, Ian C. P. Smith, John Vissing, Nanna Scharff Poulsen, Sushan Luo, Cristina Domínguez‐González, Laura Bermejo‐Guerrero, David Gómez‐Andrés, J. Sotoca, Anna Pichiecchio, Silvia Nicolosi, Mauro Monforte, Claudia Brogna, Eugenio Mercuri, Jorge A. Bevilacqua, Jorge Díaz‐Jara, Benjamín Pizarro‐Galleguillos, Peter Krkoška, Jorge Alonso‐Pérez, Montse Olivé, E. Niks, Hermien E. Kan, James B Lilleker, Mark Roberts, Bianca Buchignani, Jin‐Hong Shin, Florence Esselin, Emmanuelle Le Bars, Anne Marie Childs, Edoardo Malfatti, Anna Sárközy, Luke Perry, Sniya Sudhakar, Edmar Zanoteli, Emma Matthews, Shahram Attarian, David Bendahan, Matteo Garibaldi, Laura Fionda, Alicia Alonso‐Jiménez, Robert Carlier, Ali Asghar Okhovat, Shahriar Nafissi, Atchayaram Nalini, Seena Vengalil, Kieren G. Hollingsworth, Chiara Marini‐Bettolo, Volker Straub, Giorgio Tasca, Jaume Bacardit, Jordi Díaz‐Manera

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHereditary Neurological Disorders
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
FundersNIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research CentreMuscular Dystrophy UKDepartment of Health and Social CareJain FoundationNewcastle UniversityNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsMedicineSarcopeniaMachine learningMuscle weaknessMagnetic resonance imagingLimitingDiseaseMuscle disorderArtificial intelligenceBioinformaticsPathologyComputer scienceRadiologyInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Neuromuscular diseases (NMDs) are rare disorders characterized by progressive muscle fibre loss, leading to replacement by fibrotic and fatty tissue, muscle weakness and disability. Early diagnosis is critical for therapeutic decisions, care planning and genetic counselling. Muscle magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as a valuable diagnostic tool by identifying characteristic patterns of muscle involvement. However, the increasing complexity of these patterns complicates their interpretation, limiting their clinical utility. Additionally, multi-study data aggregation introduces heterogeneity challenges. This study presents a novel multi-study harmonization pipeline for muscle MRI and an AI-driven diagnostic tool to assist clinicians in identifying disease-specific muscle involvement patterns. METHODS: We developed a preprocessing pipeline to standardize MRI fat content across datasets, minimizing source bias. An ensemble of XGBoost models was trained to classify patients based on intramuscular fat replacement, age at MRI and sex. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework was adapted to analyse model predictions and identify disease-specific muscle involvement patterns. To address class imbalance, training and evaluation were conducted using class-balanced metrics. The model's performance was compared against four expert clinicians using 14 previously unseen MRI scans. RESULTS: Using our harmonization approach, we curated a dataset of 2961 MRI samples from genetically confirmed cases of 20 paediatric and adult NMDs. The model achieved a balanced accuracy of 64.8% ± 3.4%, with a weighted top-3 accuracy of 84.7% ± 1.8% and top-5 accuracy of 90.2% ± 2.4%. It also identified key features relevant for differential diagnosis, aiding clinical decision-making. Compared to four expert clinicians, the model obtained the highest top-3 accuracy (75.0% ± 4.8%). The diagnostic tool has been implemented as a free web platform, providing global access to the medical community. CONCLUSIONS: The application of AI in muscle MRI for NMD diagnosis remains underexplored due to data scarcity. This study introduces a framework for dataset harmonization, enabling advanced computational techniques. Our findings demonstrate the potential of AI-based approaches to enhance differential diagnosis by identifying disease-specific muscle involvement patterns. The developed tool surpasses expert performance in diagnostic ranking and is accessible to clinicians worldwide via the Myo-Guide online platform.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.804
Threshold uncertainty score0.530

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and MuscleSame topicHereditary Neurological DisordersFrench-language works237,207