MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409831611 · doi:10.2458/jpe.7585

Reading mine closure through Tłıchǫ self-determination

2025· article· en· W4409831611 on OpenAlex
John B. Zoe, Rebecca Hall, Tee Wern Lim

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Political Ecology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClosure (psychology)Reading (process)Environmental scienceChemistryPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Northern Canada, the Tłı̨chǫ have experienced a long history of settler-imposed mining. The history of the mines is written into Tłı̨chǫ place names that hold the knowledge of ecological harm and repair, the community re-purposing of mining equipment and refuse. This history and the broader context of past and present colonial dispossession of Indigenous peoples has shaped the contemporary engagement of Tłı̨chǫ with diamond mines, the largest extractive operations in the region; the Northwest Territories of Canada. The northern diamond industry is contracting, and all territorial diamond mines will likely cease production by 2035. In this article, John B. Zoe, knowledge holder and Chair of Dedats'eetsaa: Tłı̨chǫ Research and Training Institute, shares the Tłı̨chǫ experience with the diamond mines, and, as the diamond industry contracts, community experiences with and concerns surrounding forthcoming closure. Writing with collaborators and settler scholars, Rebecca Hall and Tee Wern Lim, Zoe contextualizes the community-industry agreements shaping the diamond mine closures in the long history of settler-Indigenous treaty making. While tracing the substantive gains the Tłı̨chǫ have made in their influence over mining operations on their territory, the article points to the problems that persist, as Tłı̨chǫ continue to struggle for self-determination over their lands, and extractive operations on these lands. Indeed, greater community employment and contracting with the diamond mines means that their closure will bring with it an economic rupture not experienced with past mine closure. Ultimately, Zoe asks, what is Tłı̨chǫ closure? What is an Indigenous-led approach to closure, and how might this approach make way for a future grounded in Indigenous relations to land? In response, he argues that the activities of mine closure, and subsequent economic development, must be grounded in Tłı̨chǫ land, language, culture and way of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.889
Threshold uncertainty score0.266

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it