MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409832401 · doi:10.53555/sfs.v8i3.3559

Modelling And Simulation of Shunt Active Power Filter For Power Quality Improvement

2022· article· en· W4409832401 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Arvind Kumar Kachhap, Tanuja Tak

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Quality and Harmonics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPower qualityEnvironmental sciencePower (physics)Active power filterComputer scienceAC powerElectrical engineeringEngineeringVoltagePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nowadays, power electronics devices are mostly used everywhere like domestic application, industry utilization and commercial application throughout the world [1-2]. Most of the power electronics devices are non-linear load such as variable frequency drives (VFD), personal computers, arc furnaces, switch mode power supplies (SMPS), converters and so on which led to power quality problems like voltage sag, voltage fluctuation, noises, flickering and so on [3-4]. When the current waveform does not follow the voltage waveform, it is referred as a non-linear load. Insulation failures, electrical device heating, power losses, interface problems in communication systems, and worst-case electrical power system failures are all caused by harmonic distortions on the distribution side. [5]. Therefore, eliminating the power quality issues are a big challenge for both utility and customer [6]. Furthermore, current-related power quality issues are mostly caused by harmonics, inadequate reactive power, and unbalanced loads [7]. SAPF is considered to be one of the most effective methods for achieving higher levels of power quality. By generating equal and opposite magnitude of harmonic current at PCC, SAPF is employed to inject compensating current and reduce the harmonics [8]. While performing the adopted approach, it should be noted that, the THD should not exceed 5%, as adopted by IEEE standard [9].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score0.251

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.218
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.100 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Survey in Fisheries SciencesSame topicPower Quality and HarmonicsFrench-language works237,207