Coordination contracts for a dual-channel green supply chain with demand disruption
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The primary objective of this research is to tackle the coordination issue in a green dual-channel supply chain under demand disruption. In the investigated supply chain, one kind of green product is being produced and sold through a dual-channel distribution system. To achieve coordination in the green dual-channel supply chain, three types of contracts are proposed. This study’s applications extend to both centralized and decentralized green supply chains, addressing the effects of demand disruption on coordination contracts. It also provides insights into the necessary contract modifications to enable coordination in disrupted supply chains. Results indicate that the profit-sharing and two-part tariff contracts not only can effectively coordinate the supply chain under demand disruption but also provide a win–win situation for both the environment and the supply chain members. The revenue-sharing contract, on the other hand, shows poor effectiveness and does not have enough desirability to be embraced by the members.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it