MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409834397 · doi:10.1111/jbi.15151

Determinants of the Southern Range Limit of an Infamous North American Forest Defoliator

2025· article· en· W4409834397 on OpenAlexafffund
Andrew M. Liebhold, Eugene Luzader, Jacques Régnière

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biogeography · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest ecology and management
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaCanadian Forest Service
FundersCanadian Forest ServiceResearch Executive AgencyU.S. Department of AgricultureU.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceNational Park ServiceU.S. Forest ServiceEuropean CommissionUniversity of AlbertaPennsylvania Game Commission
KeywordsRange (aeronautics)EcologyGeographyLimit (mathematics)ForestryAgroforestryBiologyEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Aim Predicting climate driven species range shifts requires knowledge of mechanisms limiting species fitness under various climatic conditions. The traditional approach of modelling ranges of herbivorous insects by fitting environmental niche models to occurrence records is generally incapable of differentiating direct effects of climate on insect populations versus indirect effects acting on the range of their host plants. Here, we delimit the southern extent of a major forest defoliator, the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana , in North America, and investigate whether its range is limited directly by climate or indirectly by the range of its host trees. Location Eastern North America. Methods We use pheromone traps to survey populations; these are sensitive tools for detecting low‐density populations. We applied mechanistic models of the effect of temperature on C. fumiferana fitness to evaluate whether these patterns of occurrence can be explained by the direct effect of climate. Results We found that this insect species is widely present through most of the southern distribution of host spruce and fir species, both in the upper Mississippi River valley and the central and southern Appalachian Mountains. The species was present in ca. 50% of spruce‐fir sites surveyed in the Appalachian Mountain region but was absent in the five most southerly sites where spruce and fir occur in eastern North America. Simulation using historical meteorological data indicated that all survey sites are climatically suitable for C. fumiferana . Conclusions Simulation of climate effects, along with the species' absence from the most southern distribution of hosts, indicate that while the southern range limit of C. fumiferana is limited by host availability it is not directly constrained by climate. Furthermore, populations at the species' southern extent may be in a dynamic state of extinction and recolonisation, thus explaining at least the temporary absence of C. fumiferana from certain locations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.558

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of BiogeographySame topicForest ecology and managementFrench-language works237,207