MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409835567 · doi:10.14740/jmc5111

Perioperative Care of a Child With Molybdenum Cofactor Deficiency

2025· article· en· W4409835567 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Elisa Villalobos, Ifeoluwa C Olakunle, Joseph D. Tobias, Ashley Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicMetalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteins
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMolybdenumPerioperativeCofactorPediatricsAnesthesiaBiochemistryMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Molybdenum is a trace mineral that is a key component of several enzyme systems. In the human body, molybdenum is complexed with a pterin-based molybdenum cofactor (MOCO), to form the active center of molybdenum-based enzymes. MOCO is synthesized in a four-step process involving six proteins, iron, ATP, and copper. Defects in any of the individual genes involved in this biosynthesis can result in molybdenum cofactor deficiency (MoCD). MoCD is an autosomal recessive disorder with an estimated incidence of 1 in 100,000 - 200,000 live births. Although most patients appear normal at birth, intractable seizures typically develop within hours to days of life, along with feeding difficulties, and subsequent microcephaly, brain atrophy, and severe developmental delay. Mortality is high, with a reported median survival of 2.4 to 3 years. Given the associated end-organ involvement, anesthetic management may be required during radiologic imaging or surgery procedures. We present a 6-year-old child with MoCD type A, who required anesthetic care for a magnetic expansion control (MAGEC) rod insertion with posterior spinal instrumentation under general anesthesia. End-organ involvement of MoCD is presented, previous reports of anesthetic care reviewed, and options for perioperative management discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicMetalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteinsFrench-language works237,207