MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409835590 · doi:10.1016/j.lansea.2025.100584

Within-laboratory SARS-CoV-2 real time PCR testing operations in Nepal: a simulation-based analysis

2025· article· en· W4409835590 on OpenAlexaff
Fannie L Côté, Nadia Lahrichi, Erica Gralla, Hannah Bakker, Parvathy Krishnan Krishnakumari, Joaquim Gromicho, Govindakarnavar Arunkumar, Runa Jha, Lilee Shrestha, Nirajan Bhusal, Saugat Shrestha, Rashmi Mulmi, Priya Jha, Reuben Samuel, Dhamari Naidoo, Victor Del Rio Vilas

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Regional Health - Southeast Asia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersTDRUnited Nations Development ProgrammeUNICEFFort Lewis CollegeWorld Health OrganizationWorld Bank Group
KeywordsSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSars virusVirologyEnvironmental scienceBiologyMedicineOutbreakInfectious disease (medical specialty)Pathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: COVID-19 has challenged entire health systems, including laboratories. To address the increasing demand for tests to inform the epidemiology of the disease and for case management purposes, many countries made significant investments to rapidly expand laboratory capacity for detecting SARS-CoV-2. In this study, we used a simulated laboratory environment, based on a model of operating laboratories in Nepal, to identify opportunities for improvement. Methods: We developed a discrete event simulation (DES) model, based on data from and in collaboration with Nepali health authorities, to analyse laboratory operations in Nepal. We used a series of "what-if" scenarios under different levels of testing demand and staffing to investigate bottlenecks in the processing of COVID-19 samples in a simulated laboratory environment, assess the impact of potential reagent shortages and increased automation, and more generally, explore the key factors that drive the performance and resilience of the testing system. Findings: Suboptimal staff allocation and scheduling can limit the timely return of laboratory results; however, better staff allocation can mitigate bottlenecks and reduce the impact of reagent shortages. For example, when the demand is 720 samples per day and seven staff members are on duty, adding one additional staff member improves reporting time (reduction from 48 h to approximately 32 h). However, changes in scheduling can increase the average time to return the results to over 200 h. A one-day reagent shortage appears to have minimal impact, but a delay of five days significantly increases the reporting time, reaching nearly 150 h. Increasing automation or better process coordination for sample registration can also lead to better performance, reducing the average reporting time from over 60 h to just under 24 h. Interpretation: Our findings identify important bottlenecks and challenges, along with ways to address them, and thus provide important lessons for improving disease testing operations for this and future pandemics. Funding: WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.596
Threshold uncertainty score0.747

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Regional Health - Southeast AsiaSame topicSARS-CoV-2 detection and testingFrench-language works237,207