Recombinant human holo-lactoferrin in complex with oleic acid suppresses the growth of solid myeloma more efficiently than its apo-form
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our previous study showed antitumor activity of the complex formed by iron-free recombinant human lactoferrin (apo-recHLF) and oleic acid (OA) (1:8 molar ratio) in a model of murine hepatoma 22a inoculated to C3HA mice. Taken alone, apo-recHLF was less efficient; i.e., the tumor growth index was 0.14 for recHLF-8OA and 0.63 for recHLF as compared with 1.0 in the control animals. In the present study, we evaluated antitumor activity of iron-saturated recHLF per se and of the complexes formed by OA with apo-recHLF and holo-recHLF. Balb/c mice with solid myeloma Sp2/0 were subjected to the 10-day treatment with daily intraperitoneal (i/p) injections of 10 mg iron-saturated recHLF with OA (1:8) per animal (0.4 g/kg). In 15 days, the tumor growth was substantially inhibited. Mean tumor mass was 93% lower as compared with the control value ( p < 0.01). I/p injections of apo-recHLF/OA complex did not inhibit the tumor growth. Holo-recHLF used without OA had less pronounced antitumor effect as compared with their complex.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".