Safety and effectiveness of a novel balloon-in-basket pulsed-field ablation catheter for the treatment of paroxysmal and persistent AF: Volt-AF IDE trial acute results
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Increasing use of Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA) to treat atrial fibrillation (AF) has led to concerns related to tissue contact, hemolysis, and electroanatomic mapping integration. A novel balloon-in-basket PFA catheter offers form and function to address these concerns. OBJECTIVE: The VOLT-AF Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) study is a prospective, single-arm global IDE study designed to demonstrate the Volt PFA system (Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, Illinois) is safe and effective for the treatment of paroxysmal AF (PAF) and persistent AF (PersAF). METHODS: Symptomatic, drug-refractory PAF and PersAF subjects were enrolled for de novo ablation. Ablation strategy was pulmonary vein isolation-only using the Volt PFA catheter with EnSite X EP System integration for visualization and dynamic contact display. End points were the rate of the device- or procedure-related SAE within 7 days and acute procedural success. RESULTS: A total of 392 subjects (57 roll-in, 335 primary analysis, 51.8% PAF, 64.7% men, age 65.0 ± 11.0 years) were enrolled at 38 sites from April to September 2024. Acute isolation was observed in 99.4% of veins (666/670) in 98.2% of patients with PAF (162/165), and in 99.8% of veins (633/634) in 99.4% of patients with PersAF (154/155), with 18.5 ± 3.6 applications/patient. Primary safety endpoint events occurred in 1.9% of subjects. Procedural efficiency and acute outcomes did not differ with fluoroscopy use. Conscious or deep sedation was associated with increased procedural efficiency, with no difference in acute success compared with general anesthesia. No clinically relevant hemolysis or kidney injury was reported. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate the acute safety and effectiveness of a novel balloon-in-basket PFA catheter to treat paroxysmal and persistent AF. Long-term outcome follow-up is ongoing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".