Evaluation of the Danfali Valley Discharges Which Flows into the Tigris River Within the City of Mosul Using the Canadian Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The current study dealt with the impact of the wastes of the Danfali Valley, located on the left side of the Tigris River, on the quality of the water of this river, which is considered the only surface resource for the residents of the city of Mosul, and evaluated the quality of this valley’s water for drinking purposes using the Canadian Water Quality Guide. Monthly samples were collected from the water of this valley and were conducted on it. Many physical and chemical tests, in addition to performing a total bacterial count and diagnosing the bacterial species present, were conducted. The results of this study showed noticeable differences in the values and concentrations of the measured variables between the two sites. At the first site, the highest values recorded were: pH 9.4, turbidity 33.84 NTU, electrical conductivity (EC) 1093μS/ cm, total dissolved salts 587mg/ L, and total hardness 300mg/ L as CaCO₃. At the second site, the corresponding values were slightly different: pH 8.9, turbidity 39.22 NTU, EC 1103μS/ cm, total dissolved salts 480mg/ L, and total hardness 258mg/ L. While the concentrations of orthophosphate and nitrate also reached 0.58 and 0.63mg/ l in the water of the first site, while in the second site their concentrations reached 0.66 and 0.78, respectively. While the results of the Canadian Water Quality Guide showed that the water of the first site was of a questionable type in terms of its use for drinking compared to the water of the second site, since it was of a poor quality and both were unfit for drinking.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".