Актуальність використання канадського інструмента оцінки виконання занять (СОРМ) для клієнтоорієнтованої та заняттєвоспрямованої ерготерапевтичної практики в Україні
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article examines the impact of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) on occupational therapy services through comparison of changes in indicators of client-centeredness and occupational focus of occupational therapy services as a result of using the COPM. This analysis was embedded in a larger study of Ukrainian translation, cross-cultural adaptation and content validation of the COPM. Aim. The aim of the study was to analyze the significance of client-centeredness and occupational focus for occupational therapy and determine the impact of the COPM on client-centeredness and occupational focus of occupational therapy services in Ukraine. Methods. The study used analysis and generalization of scientific and scientific-methodological literature, comparative analysis of data obtained through anonymous surveys of occupational therapists, and methods of statistical analysis. Results. As a result of the study, it was found that the COPM has a high potential to enhance client-centeredness and occupational therapy focus of occupational therapy services. Furthermore, the definitions of client-centeredness and occupational focus were provided and the significance of these foundational principles for occupational therapy was discussed. The COPM may be recommended to enhance client-centeredness and occupational focus of occupational therapy in various practice areas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".