MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409889205 · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.04.580

Maintenance olaparib monotherapy in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer without a germline BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutation: Final overall survival results from the OPINION trial

2025· article· en· W4409889205 on OpenAlexaff
Andrés Poveda, Stéphanie Lheureux, Nicoletta Colombo, David Cibula, Mari Elstrand, Johanne I. Weberpals, Maria Bjurberg, Ana Oaknin, Magdalena Sikorska, Antonio González‐Martín, Radosław Mądry, M.J. Rubio Pérez, Jonathan A. Ledermann, Ignacio Romero, Ozan Özgören, Alan Barnicle, Helen Marshall, Zahid Bashir, Erik Škof

Bibliographic record

VenueGynecologic Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
FundersMerck Sharp and DohmeMerckAstraZeneca
KeywordsOlaparibMedicineOvarian cancerGermlineOncologyInternal medicineGermline mutationBRCA mutationMutationCancerPoly ADP ribose polymeraseGeneticsGeneBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Maintenance olaparib demonstrated clinical activity for progression-free survival in patients without a germline BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutation (non-gBRCAm) who had platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer in the phase IIIb, open-label, single-arm, non-comparator, international OPINION trial (NCT03402841). We report final overall survival (OS; secondary endpoint), prespecified secondary endpoint updates and ad hoc OS analysis by homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and somatic BRCAm (sBRCAm) status. METHODS: Patients with non-gBRCAm platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer, ≥2 prior lines of platinum-based chemotherapy, and in response following their last platinum-based chemotherapy received 300 mg olaparib tablets twice daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: 279 patients were enrolled and treated. With a median follow-up in patients censored for OS of 33.1 months (data cut-off September 17, 2021), median OS was 32.7 months (95 % CI 29.5-35.3); the 24-month OS rate was 65.8 %. In ad hoc subgroup analyses, OS rates tended to be higher in patients with HRD-positive tumors; 24-month OS rates were 81.5 %, 74.2 %, 72.0 % and 55.8 % in the sBRCAm, HRD-positive including sBRCAm, HRD-positive excluding sBRCAm, and HRD-negative subgroups, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 82 patients (29.4 %), most commonly anemia (13.6 %). Overall, two cases of myelodysplastic syndrome were reported (no new cases since the primary analysis). CONCLUSION: These data provide additional evidence of olaparib as maintenance therapy in patients with non-gBRCAm platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer, with longer OS observed in those with HRD-positive tumors. The safety profile was consistent with the primary analysis and known safety profile of olaparib, with no new safety findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGynecologic OncologySame topicPARP inhibition in cancer therapyFrench-language works237,207