Assessing Ureteral Patency by Fluoroscopy and Ultrasonography After Subcutaneous Ureteral Bypass Device Placement for the Treatment of Benign Ureteral Obstruction in Cats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Limited information on the patency of native ureters after subcutaneous ureteral bypass (SUB) device placement is available. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the patency of native ureters in cats treated with SUB device placement for benign ureteral obstruction. ANIMALS: Cats with SUB presented for routine evaluation. METHODS: Routine ultrasound-guided SUB irrigations were performed, focusing on ureteral irrigation in the trigone and proximal urethra. Cats with obstructed nephrostomy catheters or subcutaneous ports were excluded. Fluoroscopic-guided SUB irrigations with iodinated contrast then were used to assess patency. Ureters were deemed patent if contrast filled the lumen evenly along their length, and obstructed if the contrast column was interrupted on consecutive images. Intraoperative fluoroscopy was reviewed to confirm the cause and location of the obstructions. RESULTS: Overall, 18 cats (18 SUBs; 10 unilateral, 8 bilateral) were included. The causes of obstruction were ureteroliths (23 ureters) and presumed stricture (3 ureters). A trigonal irrigation was visible in 14/18 cats (77%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 54.8%-91.0%); the patent side in bilateral SUBs could not be differentiated. Three ureters were excluded (nondiagnostic study, n = 1; obstructed nephrostomy, n = 2). Of the remaining 23 ureters, 19 (82.6%; 95% CI: 62.9%-93.0%) were patent: 16/20 patent ureters were obstructed with ureteroliths (80%; 95% CI: 58.4%-91.9%) and 3/3 with presumed stricture (100%; 95% CI: 43.9%-100%). Ureteral irrigations at the trigone were associated with patency. CONCLUSIONS: A high patency rate of native ureters after SUB placement was observed. Ureteral irrigations at the trigone reliably indicate patency. Supraphysiologic SUB irrigations may result in underdiagnosed persistent partial obstructions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".