MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409893040 · doi:10.3390/jrfm18050234

Corporate Governance: Driving Climate Change Disclosure and Advancing SDGs

2025· article· en· W4409893040 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Indah Fajarini Sri Wahyuningrum, Niswah Baroroh, Heri Yanto, Retnoningrum Hidayah, Annisa Sila Puspita, Laela Dwi Elviana

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of risk and financial management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversitas Negeri Semarang
KeywordsCorporate governanceClimate changeBusinessAccountingEnvironmental resource managementNatural resource economicsEconomicsFinanceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climate change presents a critical challenge to achieving the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 13 on Climate Action. This study examined the effect of corporate governance on carbon emission disclosure and carbon performance among 150 non-financial firms listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) from 2016 to 2022. Drawing on stakeholder, legitimacy, agency, and resource dependence theories, the study utilized panel data comprising 468 firm-year observations and employed ordinary least squares (OLS) regression to assess both direct and moderating effects. The findings indicate that governance attributes covering board size, board gender diversity, foreign ownership, and the presence of a CSR committee had a positive effect on carbon emission disclosure and carbon performance. Moreover, these governance factors enhanced the correlation between disclosure and performance, suggesting that robust governance could strengthen the environmental impact of transparency. However, board independence exhibited a negative or statistically insignificant effect, highlighting a potential disconnect between governance expectations and environmental oversight in emerging markets. Despite increasing awareness, the levels of carbon disclosure and performance in Indonesia remained low, averaging only 27.8% and 6.6%, respectively. This study provides policy recommendations to strengthen ESG regulations, encourages firms to institutionalize sustainability practices, and calls for cross-country comparative research to improve generalizability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.449
Threshold uncertainty score0.688

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of risk and financial managementSame topicCorporate Social Responsibility ReportingFrench-language works237,207