Pendampingan Kelompok melalui Penyuluhan Administrasi dan Pembuatan Pakan Alternatif di Kecamatan Losari, Kabupaten Cirebon Provinsi Jawa Barat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kegiatan ini dilaksanakan mulai Februari sampai dengan Mei 2024 berlokasi di Kecamatan Losari Kabupaten Cirebon dengan sasaran 20 pelaku utama perikanan. Materi pendampingan terdiri dari pemberdayaan masyarakat pesisir dengan memfokuskan pada administrasi kelompok serta pembuatan pakan alternatif. Metode penyuluhan yang digunakan adalah ceramah, diskusi, demcar dan dempond. Evaluasi penyuluhan dilakukan sebelum dan sesudah penyuluhan. Evaluasi meliputi aspek pengetahuan, sikap, keterampilan, dan tahapan adopsi inovasi. Penyuluhan administrasi kelompok untuk aspek pengetahuan menunjukkan peningkatan 50%, sikap 11%, dan adopsi inovasi terdapat 6 sasaran (3 kelompok) yang menerapkan inovasi berupa buku tamu dan data produksi kelompok. Dempond pakan alternatif untuk aspek pengetahuan menunjukkan peningkatan sebesar 22%, sikap 14%, keterampilan 10%, dan adopsi inovasi sasaran sudah pada tahap mencoba inovasi pakan alternatif. Berdasarkan kegiatan-kegiatan yang sudah dilakukan, pendampingan kelompok memberikan dampak panjang bagi masyarakat, berupa penerapan inovasi buku administrasi kelompok serta penggunaan pakan alternatif pada pendederan benih bandeng.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".