Contrasting Impacts of Pre-harvest Field Sprouting on the Functionality of Bread Wheat and Durum Wheat
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide This study was conducted to examine the impacts of pre-harvest field sprouting (PHS) on wheat end-use functionality of bread wheat Canada Western Red Spring (CWRS) and durum wheat Canada Western Amber Durum (CWAD). PHS affected CWRS and CWAD differently in milling performance, dough rheological properties, and final product quality. With decreasing Falling Number (FN), key quality attributes of CWAD remained mostly unchanged but CWRS quality progressively decreased, especially when FN dropped below 200 s. Both CWRS and CWAD showed signs of in situ starch hydrolysis in field-sprouted kernels with more damage apparent in CWRS as greater maltose levels were found in flour than in semolina. Analysis of gluten fractions in flour or semolina indicated that protein composition was not affected by PHS. Unlike pasta-making, which involves low water-absorption, short mixing time, and high-temperature drying, the combination of high water absorption, lower temperature, and long fermentation times magnify the detrimental effects of excessive α-amylase on the bread-making performance of CWRS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it