MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409911815 · doi:10.1016/j.ese.2025.100564

Global antibiotic hotspots and risks: A One Health assessment

2025· review· en· W4409911815 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science and Ecotechnology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersSichuan Province Science and Technology Support ProgramNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAntibioticsEnvironmental healthMedicineMicrobiologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Antibiotics are increasingly prevalent in global environments, driving antimicrobial resistance and disrupting microbial cycling. These impacts pose threats to human, animal, and environmental health. Therefore, addressing this emergent issue necessitates a One Health framework that integrates these interconnected dimensions. Here we systematically review 137 antibiotics across diverse global environmental compartments. We find that sulfonamides, macrolides, quinolones, and tetracyclines are globally ubiquitous, particularly prevalent in Asia and Africa, whereas β-lactams dominates in Europe. Hierarchical clustering revealed ten priority antibiotics in liquid phases and eight in solid phases requiring urgent attention. Regional analysis indicated the highest antibiotic concentrations within wastewater treatment plant liquids in the Americas and surface waters in Africa, with generally lower levels detected in Asia and Europe. Utilizing a One Health assessment framework, we integrated Predicted No-Effect Concentrations for antibiotic resistance selection (PNEC RS ) relevant to human and animal health with Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) affecting microbial nitrogen cycling processes. Risk assessment highlighted wastewater treatment plant liquids (20% average exceedance) and animal manure (44% average exceedance) as the most critical compartments. Africa exhibited the highest overall risk, averaging a 53% exceedance rate. Notably, ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin in liquid phases, as well as enrofloxacin and norfloxacin in solid phases, emerged as antibiotics posing significant One Health risks. This study advances our understanding of antibiotic distribution globally, offering a foundation for targeted interventions to mitigate antibiotic-related risks across human, animal, and environmental health sectors. • Global dataset compiles 137 antibiotics across eight environmental media in 46 countries. • It combines Predicted No-Effect Concentrations for Resistance Selection with Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations. • Wastewater treatment plant liquids (20%) and animal manure (44%) are the highest-risk media for antibiotic exceedance. • Africa emerges as the continent most severely impacted by antibiotic contamination risks (53% average exceedance). • Ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, enrofloxacin, and norfloxacin are critical antibiotics posing global environmental threats.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it