MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409916130 · doi:10.1186/s12879-025-11038-7

The burden and predictors of hospital-acquired infection in intensive care units across Sub-Sahara Africa: systematic review and metanalysis

2025· review· en· W4409916130 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ousman Adal, Yeshimebet Tamir Tsehay, Birhanu Ayenew, Teshager Woldegiyorgis Abate, Gebrehiwot Berie Mekonnen, Sileshi Mulatu, Sosina Tamre Mamo, Temesgen Ayenew, Mengistu Abebe Messelu, Asnake Gashaw Belayneh

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Infectious Diseases · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNosocomial Infections in ICU
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedical microbiologyTropical medicineMedicineParasitologyIntensive careIntensive care medicinePathologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired infection (HAI) refers to an infection that occurs during hospitalization and typically manifests 48 h after admission. Evidence suggests that the prevalence of HAIs in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is significantly higher compared to other regions. These infections remain a major concern in low-income countries, contributing to elevated morbidity and mortality rates. This study aimed to assess the burden and identify predictors of HAIs in intensive care units (ICUs) across SSA. METHODS: This review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Africa Index Medicus, ScienceDirect, HINARI, and Google Scholar to identify relevant studies published in English. This systematic review encompasses 44 articles published between 2003 and 2024, with the majority (22 articles) published recently between 2020 and 2024. The actual database search was conducted between January 1, 2025, and February 1, 2025. Articles irrelevant to this study's objectives, those without abstracts or full texts, unpublished reports, editorials, studies that did not clearly define outcomes, and studies written in languages other than English were excluded. The analysis was conducted using Stata version 17. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO under the registration number CRD 63,194,923,892. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and data extraction followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. RESULTS: A total of 44 primary samples were included in this meta-analysis. Using the random effect DerSimonian model, we showed that the pooled prevalence of hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) in intensive care units was 28.22% (95% CI: 23.61-32.81). Determinants of HAIs in the intensive care units included neonatal or advanced age (> 50 years), intubation, trauma, surgery, presence of comorbidities, catheterization, prolonged hospital stay, and HIV-positive status. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Individuals in extreme age groups, those with chronic diseases or immunocompromised conditions, and patients with specific risk factors (e.g., catheterization, prolonged hospitalization) were more prone to HAIs. Strengthening the quality of care and implementing effective infection control measures are recommended to reduce the burden of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in sub-Saharan Africa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Infectious DiseasesSame topicNosocomial Infections in ICUFrench-language works237,207