MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409920214 · doi:10.1016/j.gassur.2025.102067

First-in-human side-to-side linear magnetic compression gastroileostomy: feasibility and early outcomes in adults with obesity

2025· article· en· W4409920214 on OpenAlexaff
Michel Gagner, Lamees Almutlaq, Gismonde Gnanhoue, Jane N. Buchwald

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGastro-IleostomyCompression (physics)General surgeryInternal medicineDiseaseRefluxComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conventional surgical stapling/suturing requires tissue fixation with retained potentially inflammatory materials. A novel minimally invasive magnetic compression anastomosis system that requires no fixation, enterotomy closure, or permanent implant seems to mitigate major complications associated with stapling/suturing. As an option for revision of clinically suboptimal sleeve gastrectomy (SG), the technical feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of magnetic gastroileostomy bipartition (MagGI procedure) were evaluated in a first-in-human case series. In this prospective single-center study, adults with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥30.0 to ≤50.0 kg/m 2 who were candidates for SG revision underwent the MagGI procedure. A distal magnet was delivered endoscopically with laparoscopic assistance to the ileum. A proximal magnet was positioned endoscopically in the gastric antrum. The magnets were aligned to gradually fuse, forming a gastroileal bipartition. The primary safety endpoint was minimal incidence of device- and procedure-related severe adverse events (SAEs) (Clavien-Dindo [CD] classification). The primary efficacy endpoint was technical feasibility. The secondary endpoints were reduction of weight and metabolic parameters. Between November 27, 2023, and May 27, 2024, 7 patients (mean BMI of 38.8 ± 0.9 kg/m 2 ) underwent revisional MagGI. Feasibility was demonstrated, and patent gastroileal anastomoses were confirmed in 100.0% of cases, with no device-related events and 1 SAE with a CD III mild rating. There was no anastomotic leakage, bleeding, obstruction, infection, or stricture. Total weight loss and excess weight loss were 18.9% ± 3.9% and 52.4% ± 11.0%, respectively. A BMI reduction of 7.4 kg/m 2 was observed ( P <.05). Mild nutritional concerns were treated. At the 6-month interim evaluation, the MagGI procedure was performed to revise clinically suboptimal SG. In addition, the procedure was technically straightforward, incurred no major complications, and renewed clinically meaningful weight loss in a small cohort.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.896

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Gastrointestinal SurgerySame topicBariatric Surgery and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207