MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409920786 · doi:10.1038/s41531-025-00934-z

LRRK2 rare-variant per-domain genetic burden in Parkinson’s Disease: association confined to the kinase domain

2025· article· en· W4409920786 on OpenAlexafffund
Sitki Cem Parlar, Konstantin Senkevich, Eric Yu, Jennifer A. Ruskey, Jamil Ahmad, Farnaz Asayesh, Dan Spiegelman, Cheryl Waters, Oury Monchi, Yves Dauvilliers, Nicolas Dupré, Lior Greenbaum, Sharon Hassin‐Baer, Irina Miliukhina, Alla Timofeeva, Anton Emelyanov, Sofya Pchelina, Roy N. Alcalay, Edward A. Fon, Jean‐François Trempe, Ziv Gan‐Or

Bibliographic record

Venuenpj Parkinson s Disease · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill Genome CentreUniversité LavalHotchkiss Brain InstituteOntario Brain InstituteMcGill UniversityUniversity of CalgaryMcGill University Health CentreMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersAccelerated Innovation Research Initiative Turning Top Science and Ideas into High-Impact ValuesNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlliance de recherche numérique du CanadaMcGill UniversityU.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesNational Institutes of HealthCanada First Research Excellence FundCelgeneSanofiGlaxoSmithKlinePfizerNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeVerily Life SciencesBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsLRRK2Parkinson's diseaseProtein kinase domainDiseaseGenetic associationMedicineGeneticsDomain (mathematical analysis)Internal medicineBiologyBioinformaticsOncologyGeneSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract LRRK2 variants are key genetic risk factors for Parkinson’s Disease (PD). We conducted a per-domain rare coding variant burden analysis, including 8,888 PD cases and 69,412 controls. In meta-analysis, the Kinase domain was strongly associated with PD (Exonic: P FDR = 1.61 × 10−22, Non-synonymous: P FDR = 1.54 × 10−23, CADD > 20: P FDR = 3.09 × 10−24). Excluding the p.G2019S variant nullified this effect. Nominal associations were found in the ANK and Roc-COR domains, with potentially protective variants, p.R793M and p.Q1353K.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuenpj Parkinson s DiseaseSame topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207