MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409944683 · doi:10.7759/cureus.83174

Jejunal Ectopic Pancreas: A Case Report and Literature Review

2025· article· en· W4409944683 on OpenAlexaff
Logan Prager, Masoumeh Ghayouri, Thomas Abbruzzese, Ji Fan

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsBrandon UniversityBrandon Regional Health Authority
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEctopic pancreasGeneral surgeryPancreasInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This case report describes a rare etiology of a symptomatic small bowel mass that had been causing our patient spontaneous abdominal pain, nausea, and loss of appetite. The patient is a 53-year-old Caucasian male undergoing chemotherapy and radiation for a nasopharyngeal Epstein-Barr virus-positive carcinoma. He presented to the urgent care with two days of sharp upper abdominal pain and nausea without association of symptoms to prior chemotherapy treatments. Workup initially suggested a jejunal hematoma, which was later revealed to be a mass. The patient underwent outpatient robot-assisted laparoscopic resection of the mass. Pathology demonstrated benign ectopic pancreatic tissue invading through the serosa into the muscularis propria with the sampled lymph nodes negative for malignancy. Ectopic pancreas is a rare congenital abnormality most commonly found in the gastrointestinal tract. Most cases are asymptomatic, but epigastric pain is the most common symptom, followed by nausea, vomiting, and hematochezia. While a benign finding, the index of suspicion for malignancy should remain high as diagnosis can be difficult. Ectopic pancreatic tissue is susceptible to the same pathology that may affect a native pancreas, including pancreatitis and pancreatic malignancy. Radiological and endoscopy studies are useful adjuncts that may increase clinical suspicion; however, it is difficult to differentiate ectopic pancreas from a neoplasm without tissue biopsy. Although no standardized approach exists, surgical resection remains a mainstay of diagnosis and treatment, especially in anatomic locations not amenable to endoscopic intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0100.008
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicGastrointestinal disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207