MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409956644 · doi:10.5812/jjm-159160

Human Papillomavirus and Thyroid Cancer: Transformative Insights Into Postoperative Interventions and Sleep Quality Improvement: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis

2025· article· en· W4409956644 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Meng Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueJundishapur Journal of Microbiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer survivorship and care
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTransformative learningPsychological interventionThyroid cancerHuman papillomavirusMeta-analysisSleep qualitySleep (system call)KowsarThyroidOncologyInternal medicineGeneral surgeryInsomniaNursingPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a well-established oncogenic virus implicated in cervical, oropharyngeal, and anogenital malignancies. Emerging evidence suggests its potential role in thyroid cancer pathogenesis. Patients with thyroid cancer frequently experience obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), which may be exacerbated by thyroid dysfunction. Thyroidectomy has been reported to improve sleep quality; however, the interplay between HPV infection, thyroid cancer progression, and postoperative sleep improvements remains inadequately understood. This meta-analysis systematically evaluates the impact of thyroidectomy on sleep parameters in thyroid cancer patients, with a specific focus on those affected by HPV. Objectives: To quantify the effects of thyroidectomy on sleep quality in patients with thyroid cancer, particularly those with HPV infection. This study assesses improvements in key OSA indicators, including the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and nocturnal oxygen saturation, while elucidating the clinical implications of the HPV-thyroid cancer association. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library for studies published between January 2010 and December 2024. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case-control studies evaluating postoperative sleep outcomes in thyroid cancer patients with documented HPV status. Two independent reviewers conducted data extraction and quality assessment, resolving discrepancies through consensus. The methodological rigor of the included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A meta-analysis was performed using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model, with heterogeneity assessed via Cochran’s Q and I2 statistics. Publication bias was examined using funnel plots and Egger’s test. Results: Out of 203 screened records, 11 studies (comprising 1,432 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Thyroidectomy led to statistically and clinically significant improvements in sleep quality. The mean preoperative AHI of 42.8 ± 8.6 declined to 36.6 ± 8.4 postoperatively (Hedges’ g = -0.38, 95% CI: -0.67 to -0.09, P = 0.01), reflecting a moderate yet meaningful improvement in OSA severity. Daytime sleepiness showed a substantial reduction, with ESS scores decreasing from 15.3 ± 4.7 to 7.5 ± 6.07, demonstrating a marked enhancement in daily functioning. The HPV infection was associated with a 2.2-fold increased risk of thyroid cancer (OR = 2.199, 95% CI: 1.31 - 3.23, P < 0.05), reinforcing its potential role in thyroid carcinogenesis. Moderate heterogeneity was observed in OSA-related outcomes (I2 = 59.27%, P = 0.01), while the HPV-thyroid cancer association displayed minimal heterogeneity (I2 = 0.00%, P = 0.64). Conclusions: Thyroidectomy significantly enhances sleep quality in thyroid cancer patients, with notable reductions in AHI and ESS scores, underscoring its clinical benefit. The strong association between HPV and thyroid cancer highlights the potential necessity of HPV screening in thyroid cancer risk assessment and postoperative surveillance. These findings advocate for the consideration of HPV as a modifiable risk factor, warranting further research into tailored screening protocols and refined postoperative strategies to optimize patient outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.025
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.054
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0250.054
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0140.057
Bibliometrics0.0060.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJundishapur Journal of MicrobiologySame topicCancer survivorship and careFrench-language works237,207