MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409958563 · doi:10.1080/19317611.2025.2497384

“Seeing Is Believing”: Identifying the Sexual and Reproductive Health Priorities of Adolescent Girls and Young Women in Freedom Park, South Africa Through an Adapted Body Mapping Approach

2025· article· en· W4409958563 on OpenAlex
Maya Stevens-Uninsky, Najuwa Gallant, Tashreeq Chatting, Deborah DiLiberto, Russell J. de Souza, Lawrence Mbuagbaw

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sexual Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Canadian institutionsSt. Joseph’s Healthcare HamiltonImpactPopulation Health Research InstituteMcMaster University
FundersOntario HIV Treatment Network
KeywordsReproductive healthGender studiesPsychologyDemographySociologyPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: This study uses a decolonized research approach to identify the sexual and reproductive health (SRH) priorities of adolescent women living in Freedom Park, Cape Town, South Africa. The history of colonialism and apartheid has a significant ongoing impact on the SRH of women in the community. The objectives of the research were for adolescent women to create a shared definition of SRH and identify SRH needs and priorities. Methods: A qualitative, participatory action design guided by decolonized methodologies was employed. Community members co-developed a modified body mapping exercise, ensuring cultural appropriateness and participant privacy. This participatory tool was used to explore SRH issues, leveraging its ability to foster dialogue and self-expression in a safe and collaborative environment. Seven workshops were conducted, engaging 54 adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) aged 16-25. Participant body maps and narratives were analyzed with the community through thematic coding and visual interpretation. Results: Participants defined SRH, and illustrated SRH body parts, outcomes, and priorities on their body maps. Five themes were identified when discussing priority SRH issues: reproductive health and sexual wellness, abuse and violence, mental health, support and knowledge, and social pressures. Participants identified the two SRH issues they most wanted to address in their community as gender-based violence (GBV) and adolescent pregnancy. The body mapping methodology fostered open discussion and provided insight into personal lived experiences. Conclusions: This study highlights socio-economic factors, cultural context, and historical influences as intersecting root causes of SRH outcomes in Freedom Park. The participatory body mapping approach empowered AGYW to express their SRH needs and identify community-driven priorities. Findings underscore the importance of contextualized, culturally sensitive research methods in addressing complex health challenges. Future interventions should address GBV and adolescent pregnancy through community-led strategies to foster sustainable change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.239
Threshold uncertainty score0.914

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.149
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it