MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409959677 · doi:10.3389/fphys.2025.1426648

Alterations in blood pressure dependent activation of leg muscles during standing following bed rest mimic those observed with ageing

2025· article· en· W4409959677 on OpenAlexafffund
Malcom F. Tremblay, Da Xu, Ajay Verma, Nandu Goswami, Andrew P. Blaber

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Physiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersSimon Fraser University
KeywordsAgeingRest (music)Bed restLeg muscleBlood pressureAnatomyMedicineChemistryPhysical medicine and rehabilitationCardiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Baroreflex-mediated activation of lower leg muscles (i.e., muscle-pump baroreflex) has been suggested to play a significant role in blood pressure regulation during standing. Compromised muscle-pump baroreflex because of ageing or prolonged inactivity could contribute to orthostatic hypotension. Understanding the contribution of individual lower leg muscles to blood pressure regulation could lead to the development of muscle-specific strategies to prevent orthostatic hypotension associated with muscle-pump baroreflex dysfunctions. Methods In this study, individual muscle (tibialis anterior (TA), lateral soleus (SOL), medial gastrocnemius (MG), and lateral gastrocnemius (LG)) responses to blood pressure changes upon a supine-to-stand orthostatic challenge were examined in young adult male participants (35 ± 2 years) before and after 60 days of 6° head-down tilt bed rest (HDBR). By analyzing the interactions between systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heartbeat-by-heartbeat electromyogram impulse (EMGimp) during standing, the interactions between SBP and EMGimp including muscle-pump baroreflex were characterized by fraction time active (FTA) and response gain from wavelet transform coherence analysis and the causality values using convergent cross mapping method for individual leg muscles. Since inactivity and ageing are common causes of orthostatic intolerance, the HDBR results were compared with those from young and older individuals in a previously published study to investigate the similarities in their effects on muscle-pump baroreflex. Results During standing, FTA reduced for all muscles except MG following HDBR and was lower in older compared to younger participants. Muscle-pump baroreflex causality (SBP→EMGimp) reduced for all muscles following HDBR and was lower for LG and SOL muscles in older compared to younger adults. The mechanical muscle-pump causality (SBP→EMGimp) was not affected by HDBR or by age. Increased TA muscle-pump baroreflex gain post-HDBR may point to a compensatory mechanism for decreased active control. Conclusions Our results showed striking similarities in the alteration of muscle-pump baroreflex induced via ageing and HDBR, suggesting strong commonalities between ageing and long-term inactivity in terms of the adverse effects on baroreflex mediated control of lower leg muscle activities in response to orthostatic challenge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PhysiologySame topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207