South Asian Society for Sexual Medicine School, Bangladesh: a multidisciplinary training initiative in an under-resourced country
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background The yearly courses conducted by the South Asian Society for Sexual Medicine (SASSM) in Bangladesh establish a collaborative training paradigm designed to increase healthcare professionals’ comfort with sexual medicine and develop skills for giving the best treatment possible to individuals with sexual health issues and dysfunctions. Aim The study assessed the impact of course completion on SASSM School Bangladesh participants. Methods A pretest–posttest of 116 (57%) SASSM participants was conducted, comprising data on knowledge acquisition following the 3-day program in 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2021. A paired t-test was applied to compare the difference between pretest and posttest performance. Logistic regression was conducted to assess the influence of socio-demographic variables. Outcomes The study demonstrates that the SASSM School Bangladesh program significantly improves participants’ knowledge of sexual medicine, with a 12.7-unit increase in test scores, irrespective of socio-demographic factors. Results Majority (102, or 75% of those polled) of the participants were men. Psychiatrists were the most common respondents (39%), followed by dermatologists (32%), urologists (12%), and gynecologists (8%) who completed both surveys. There was a significant difference (P-value < .01) in mean pretest (49.6 ± 17.1) and posttest (62.3 ± 15.5) scores. The socio-demographic factors (gender, location, age, and experience) do not have any significant influence on gain of knowledge through the SASSM training program as the P-value of odds ratio or adjusted odds ratio from logistic regression is P > .05. Clinical Implications The study highlights the clinical importance of structured training in sexual medicine, ensuring that healthcare professionals across various specialties are better equipped to diagnose and manage sexual health issues effectively. Strengths and Limitations The study used a pretest–posttest design to measure actual knowledge improvement. Paired t-test and logistic regression were applied to ensure robust analysis. Diverse professionals from psychiatry, dermatology, urology, and gynecology participated in the study, making the findings relevant across specialties. This study evaluates the only structured sexual medicine training program in Bangladesh, contributing new insights into medical education. However, the findings may not be generalizable beyond Bangladesh. The study could not assess whether knowledge retention and clinical practice improved over time. Participants voluntarily enrolled in the study, which can possibly represent a group already interested in sexual medicine. The study focused only on knowledge improvement, not on changes in clinical practice or patient outcomes. Conclusion Specialists of sexual medicine have a unique opportunity to learn and certify their knowledge through the SASSM program, the first of its kind in Bangladesh.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it